NSO Group Liable for Attacks on 1,400 WhatsApp Users: A Landmark Ruling
Share
NSO Group Found Liable in Landmark WhatsApp Lawsuit
In a significant ruling, NSO Group, the entity responsible for the notorious Pegasus spyware, has been held liable in a lawsuit filed by Meta’s WhatsApp. This lawsuit, which dates back to 2019, pertains to unauthorized attacks on approximately 1,400 devices.
Background of the Case
WhatsApp initially sought legal action against NSO Group after investigations revealed that Pegasus was used to infiltrate the phones of activists, journalists, and government officials. This invasive software has raised concerns regarding privacy and security worldwide.
Legal Findings
The court found NSO Group liable for multiple charges, including:
- Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
- Violation of the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act
- Breach of contract
The ruling emphasizes that a trial will proceed solely to determine the extent of damages. NSO Group contended that it is not liable, asserting that its clients directed the use of Pegasus in criminal investigations and national security matters. However, the judge dismissed these defenses, potentially setting a crucial precedent for other companies operating in the spyware domain.
Implications for Privacy
Will Cathcart, the head of WhatsApp, heralded the ruling as a victory for privacy. In a post on Threads, he stated, “We spent five years presenting our case because we firmly believe that spyware companies could not hide behind immunity or avoid accountability for their unlawful actions.” He further asserted that surveillance companies should understand that illegal spying will face legal repercussions.
Next Steps for NSO Group
As of now, NSO Group has not publicly commented on the court’s decision. The upcoming trial focusing on damages will determine the consequence of their actions.
A Call for Awareness on Spyware Issues
This ruling serves as a critical reminder of the need for stronger regulations and accountability in the surveillance industry. The potential for illegal spying poses risks to individual privacy and freedom, emphasizing that greater awareness and action are necessary.