Misinformation Researcher Admits ChatGPT Introduced Errors in Legal Filing

Misinformation Expert Faces Scrutiny Over AI-Generated Citations

A recent incident has thrown the relationship between artificial intelligence and legal filings into the spotlight. Jeff Hancock, an acclaimed misinformation expert, has admitted to using ChatGPT to assist in organizing citations concerning Minnesota's controversial “Use of Deep Fake Technology to Influence an Election” law.

The Background

Hancock, founder of the Stanford Social Media Lab, submitted a legal affidavit in support of the law, which is currently being contested by conservative YouTuber Christopher Khols, also known as Mr. Reagan, along with Minnesota state Rep. Mary Franson. The affidavit, however, came under fire when attorneys representing Khols and Franson claimed the document contained citations that were either inaccurate or did not exist, hence labeling it “unreliable.”

Hallucinations and Errors Explained

In a timely response to the concerns, Hancock issued a declaration, clarifying his use of ChatGPT. The expert maintained that while he indeed utilized the AI tool to assist in creating a list of citations, he personally authored and reviewed the substantive claims presented in the document.

"I wrote and reviewed the substance of the declaration, and I stand firmly behind each of the claims made in it," Hancock asserted. He noted that he had aimed to integrate existing knowledge with new scholarship found via Google Scholar and GPT-4.

Acknowledging Mistakes

Interestingly, Hancock characterized the citation errors as 'hallucinations,' a term often used to describe inaccuracies generated by AI models. He recognized that these mistakes involved incorrect authorship in some instances. "I did not intend to mislead the Court or counsel," he stated, expressing regret for any resulting confusion.

The Larger Implications

This incident raises critical questions about the reliability of AI-assisted research in legal contexts and underscores the necessity for transparency regarding the use of such technologies. As AI tools become more integrated into academic and legal environments, it is imperative for professionals to understand both their capabilities and limitations.

Conclusion: A Call for Careful Integration

As AI continues to evolve, it presents vast potential for enhancing research capabilities. However, experts like Hancock highlight the importance of thorough verification and accountability in utilizing AI-generated outputs, especially in sensitive areas such as law and public policy.

Download the AI Chat App for Enhanced Conversations

If you are looking for an interactive chat experience powered by token-based AI technology, consider downloading AI Chat for iOS or AI Chat for Android. Experience engaging conversations and expert advice at your fingertips with AI Chat, your trusted companion for creative content creation.