Drake and Kendrick Lamar legal dispute regarding music streaming

Drake Withdraws Petition Against UMG and Spotify Over Kendrick Lamar Diss Track

Drake Discontinues Legal Petition Against Spotify and UMG

In a surprising turn of events, rapper Drake, whose real name is Aubrey Graham, has officially withdrawn his petition against Spotify and Universal Music Group (UMG) regarding the enhancement of Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us." This decision was filed with the New York Supreme Court on Tuesday, marking the end of proceedings with no financial obligations incurred by any of the parties involved.

Understanding the Legal Context

It's important to note that Drake's petition, classified as a "pre-action case," is not a full-fledged lawsuit. Instead, it serves as a preemptive step in the litigation process allowing Drake and his legal team to seek information from both Spotify and UMG while aiming to resolve the issues outside of a courtroom setting.

Allegations Against Spotify and UMG

Drake's initial legal challenges, filed in November, accused both entities of manipulating the streaming landscape. Specifically, he alleged that they used "bots," engaged in discounted licensing practices, and implemented pay-to-play agreements to artificially inflate the streaming numbers of Lamar's controversial track. This diss track came to prominence during a public feud between the two artists, garnering significant media attention.

Defamation Claims and Ongoing Legal Matters

In addition to targeting Spotify, Drake filed a second petition against UMG, alleging that they improperly directed payments to iHeartRadio to further promote Lamar's track. The diss track in question includes derogatory references to Drake, labeling him a "certified pedophile" and a "predator." Drake's legal team argues that the inflammatory nature of the lyrics constitutes defamation and significantly harms his reputation.

Current Status of Legal Proceedings

While Drake's initial pre-action case has been withdrawn, the second legal petition directed at UMG and iHeartRadio remains active. Spotify had previously contested the initial petition but has not raised any objections to Drake's recent decision to withdraw it. UMG has chosen to reserve its position on the matter, remaining silent throughout these developments.

Impact on the Music Industry

This incident highlights the ongoing conflicts within the music industry regarding artist promotion, streaming metrics, and the complexities of rapper feuds. As more artists become technologically savvy and utilize platforms like Spotify, legal battles over perceived injustices may continue to emerge.

Conclusion

Drake's reprieve from the legal dispute may serve as a pivotal moment in his career while also setting a precedent for future cases within the intersecting worlds of music, technology, and law.

For those interested in the latest developments in music and technology, remember to keep an eye on how such disputes evolve within the industry.

AI Chat – WEB3 Private: Your Gateway to Interactive Chat Experience Powered by Token-Based AI is not just a chatbot; it is a dynamic platform that facilitates creative content creation, expert advice, and engaging conversations using the latest technology. Available through the mobile app, it redefines AI-powered conversations. Download now: iOS | Android.

Back to blog